August 19, 2008
WHAT EXACTLY HAS GEM TECHNOLOGIES
CAPTURED WITH GEM ENERGY?
In the course of a contact by a business company after our GEM
Energy battery experiment, the testing facility injected the Beebe
Formula into a glass flask. The flask was monitored with probes
and wired to a battery monitoring system.
- "We mixed your specified formula into a 1000 ml
two-neck round bottom flask. Upon doing so, we
immediately noticed a reaction. Furthermore,
although the solution not being a battery, we
decided to use a battery cell monitoring system
(normally used to monitor battery anomalies) to
see what, if any, readings we could obtain from
the solution. We inserted two probes into the
solution and wired them to the monitoring system.
We were absolutely amazed when we started
receiving data… this should not be possible with
your formula. We received indications of voltage
and current. We let the system run overnight to
monitor the solution and reviewed the information
the following morning.
We received 23 “spikes” (not sure what else to
call them) which were instantaneous and less than
1/100th of a second and indicating power being
produced. We were unable to determine the cause(s)
of this reaction, as well as why any of this occurred;
and by what we currently know, there should not have
been any reaction whatsoever and this should be
impossible.
I can see the possibility of application in our own
industry as a “Green” non-hazardous electrolyte.
Our industry alone is approximately $15 Billion
annually.
I am excited as well as amazed at what I think you
may have discovered."
Verbally, G.E.M. Technologies was told that there were 23 spikes
over approximately 90 minutes, with each spike being anywhere
from 560-620 kilojoules. In trying to convert this energy to
represent it fully, see below.
Since these energy spikes occurred in 1/100th of a second
(could be less, but their system would only go to 1/100th of a
second), the following numbers need to reflect that, so you will
be given three parameters (1 second in time, X 100 to represent
1/100th of a second, and X 23 to reflect the total power within
90 minutes. See below:
The potential of GEM Energy seems to be glaringly evident by
the above numbers.
How can anyone dismiss this potential?
How can anyone not understand that we are tapped into
something here which has the potential to eliminate our
dependence on fossil fuels and take us beyond what
science currently knows?
- August 11, 2008
AC and DC power proven again in latest
test.
July 29, 2008
GEM Energy is proven in a simple battery
experiment!
To summarize the results, there was no use of sulfuric acid
electrolyte and we did not flood the cells with distilled water.
We injected the GEM Energy on 06/30/2008. We
immediately measured 7.42 Volts.
We tested the volt readings for two weeks and still
maintained voltage. A load was placed on the battery
(still without sulfuric acid or distilled water in a wet-cell
battery), and the experiment was monitored from June
30th to July 15th (16 days).
At this point, GEM Water was injected into the cells (the
water which remains after a GEM Energy test in a flask).
We were able to operate both a fan (5.5 VDC/.23 Amp)
and power a light (2.4 V DC). Amazingly enough we were
able to measure both AC and DC voltage in a free standing
battery. Our experiment concluded on July 27, 2008.
We understand that a lead-acid battery is not the ideal
environment for our energy, but what G.E.M. Technologies
has proven is that GEM Energy is currently way beyond
any battery technology out on the market at this time in
terms of safety for the environment, and the output of both
AC or DC power.
July 2, 2008
GEM ENERGY MIRACLE
- Up to this point in time, G.E.M. Technologies has been working
with this NEW GEM ENERGY within the confines of a two-neck
glass flask. Our studies and testing of this energy have been
surprising, miraculous, and uplifting. The safety of this energy
has been confirmed over many, many tests. Its longevity and
sustainability have been confirmed over many, many tests. An
idea was born and we acted on that idea. Since we were
unable to implement diodes or cathodes in our glass flasks, we
needed to confirm that this would produce in the Omega Energy
Cell the type of power we knew was there to capture.
We took a 12-volt lead-acid motorcycle battery which did not
have the acid already inserted. In place of the acid, we injected
GEM Energy. These batteries also require wet cells, but our
GEM Energy had less than 100 ml of water per the formula. We
were concerned about this, but forged ahead to see what would
happen. The directions for the battery were to pour in the acid
and then to charge the battery.
After the injection of GEM Energy and without the appropriate
amount of water in the lead-acid wet-cell battery, we
instantaneously had 7.4 volts of power. This was before and
instead of any charge to the battery whatsoever. This was four
days ago and we still have 7 volts of power in this battery, and
this is without any water in the cells. The GEM Energy is
powerful and just needs the appropriate setting (prototype) to
direct it for use by the world.
Some investors have said that we were a science experiment in a
flask, but we took a chance and tried this in a 12-volt battery to
prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that we had an energy which
is clean, sustainable, and ready to be used by the world at large.
We also want to try our GEM Energy formula in a fuel cell,
making it a closed cell, and seeing how long this GEM Energy
will continue to circulate and produce power. We are convinced
that this will be months or years longer than anything currently out
there on the market or in the design process.
Our GEM Energy is just waiting for the day when a farsighted
investor funds us so that we can build an Omega Energy Cell
and change the world forever. However the above experiment
in a lead-acid battery (without the acid or water) proves that we
are no longer a science experiment, but a new and innovative
change in finding a better solution to our current and future
energy needs.
June 27, 2008
SPECIAL NEWS BULLETIN
During our third round of testing, we have expanded upon our
knowledge and product line. We are so excited that we wanted
to share this information with our website visitors.
REACTION CHAMBER - TEST 2 – APRIL 10, 2008:
We did an injection of GEM energy into this flask on 04/10/2008.
It has continuously been swirling with energy since that time,
nearly three months. Nothing else has been added and, yet,
it still produces AMPS, OHMS, and KILOHERTZ. A flask is
certainly not the ideal atmosphere for energy such as this, but it
does go a long way in confirming the self-sustaining claim about
this GEM energy.
- TESLA’S WIRELESS TRANSMISSION OF ENERGY:
We decided to experiment with this type of potential energy
transmission because of our exceptional energy product.
We knew that Tesla was trying to capture the energy of the
ionosphere, and we knew that we had that in our GEM Energy.
We felt that this was a SHORTCUT to attempting this type of
experimentation.
We tried several different methods and finally built a simple
prototype that is still resident in the ground and producing
VOLTS, AMPS, OHMS, and KILOHERTZ. Our problem currently
is that the OHMS are way too high at 30,000,000 which is
restricting the flow of VOLTS to the system. Once we figure
out how to reduce the resistance in the system, we believe that
we have a very good shot at duplicating and enhancing Tesla’s
work in this direction.
Why is this work important?
We envision a day when the potential to deliver energy
wirelessly could be coming from a satellite to a receiver in
your home (just like television is directed from a satellite to a
receiver in your home).
January 14, 2008 - Test results available upon request.
November 8, 2007 - Test results available upon request.
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |